UK Casino Executives Highlight Risks from Proposed Machine Games Duty Increase
Jonas Becker · Oct 17, 2026

UK Casino Executives Highlight Risks from Proposed Machine Games Duty Increase

Executives from major UK casino operators gathered in London to address a proposed rise in Machine Games Duty that could double the current rate from 20% to 40%, and they outlined several potential consequences for the sector while noting recent positive shifts from regulatory changes.
Panel Discussions and Industry Context
Representatives from Genting Casinos, Rank Group along with other operators spoke at the event and explained how the suggested increase, which has been floated by the Social Market Foundation and possibly considered for inclusion in an upcoming autumn Budget, might affect business operations across land-based venues. Those who've studied the proposal know it would apply to gaming machines in casinos and similar locations, yet early outcomes from the Gambling Commission's 2025 land-based reforms have already delivered measurable gains such as higher machine numbers and expansion plans from groups like Rank.
Observers note the timing creates a contrast because the reforms introduced last year encouraged investment and growth in physical sites, but the tax adjustment under discussion could reverse some of those gains according to the executives present. A report presented at the panel including findings from 23 operators provided supporting details on current performance metrics and projected scenarios if the duty rises.
Projected Effects on Operations and Employment
Data from the panel indicates that the higher duty rate could lead to reduced capital spending on venue improvements, lower staffing levels at existing locations, and ultimately the closure of some sites that operate on thinner margins. Figures shared during the discussion estimate up to 3,800 direct and indirect job losses across the supply chain and related services if the change takes effect without adjustments. Operators described how increased costs would force decisions on cutting shifts, limiting opening hours in certain venues, and scaling back marketing or maintenance budgets that support customer experience.
Those familiar with the sector's structure point out that many casinos rely on machine revenue to cover overheads and fund live gaming tables plus hospitality offerings, so a significant tax hike would compress those margins quickly. The report highlighted case examples from multiple operators where similar fiscal pressures in the past led to postponed refurbishments and delayed hiring, patterns that could repeat at a larger scale here.
Statements from Key Figures
Genting Casinos chief operating officer Paul Willcock addressed the audience directly and stated that the group stands ready to commit substantial investment in the UK market provided fiscal certainty is established in the near term. He explained that clear tax rules would allow planning for new sites and upgrades, whereas uncertainty around the Machine Games Duty proposal has already prompted caution in forward budgeting. Rank Group representatives echoed similar sentiments and noted their recent estate expansions were enabled by the post-2025 reform environment that increased allowable machine counts and streamlined certain licensing processes.
Executives emphasized that investment decisions hinge on predictable costs, and the potential doubling would shift resources toward cost containment rather than growth initiatives. They connected these points to broader economic contributions from the industry including supplier contracts and local authority revenues that could diminish under the higher duty structure.

Reform Outcomes and Ongoing Considerations
The Gambling Commission's 2025 adjustments produced early results that included more machines on casino floors and prompted several operators to announce expansion plans for their estates, developments that executives contrasted with the risks of the proposed tax change. Panel participants described how these reforms allowed better utilization of floor space and supported additional employment in some locations, yet they warned that the benefits remain vulnerable to tax policy shifts.
According to the survey data shared, operators have seen incremental revenue growth from the extra machines but margins stay sensitive to duty rates, which means any increase would require offsetting measures such as reduced headcount or venue rationalization. The discussion stayed focused on land-based operations and avoided broader speculation, instead presenting specific projections tied to the 20% to 40% scenario.
Conclusion
The London panel brought together perspectives from Genting Casinos, Rank Group and additional operators to detail how the suggested Machine Games Duty adjustment might affect future investment, staffing and venue viability while acknowledging the gains already realized from the 2025 reforms. The report presented at the event supplied quantitative backing for these points and reinforced the call for fiscal stability ahead of any autumn Budget decisions. Executives indicated that clarity on tax rates would unlock further commitments, whereas the proposed increase could constrain activity across multiple sites.